Maddox Plea Agreement

By | September 26, 2021

The couple have long denied any fault, but asked to be heard last week to change their pleas of not guilty. The step that happened after the government exchanged devastating evidence for them, including secretly recorded conversations, likely means they are considering cooperating with the government to reduce their sentences. Why did they have to make a deal to Page Carter Smith when they already had Scott Maddox? This is not the case. Unless Maddox said, please, give my mistress a deal………. The signature page of the two agreements is presented below. Maddox and Carter Smith`s guilty confession relate to their dealings with ride-sharing giant Uber, which was looking for favorable provisions in a city bylaw, and a development company that turned out to be an FBI front company. Uber paid US$40,000 over several months in 2015 to its governance consulting firm; The governance, meanwhile, paid Maddox $40,000. The shell company sent four cheques for US$10,000 to Governance from late 2016 to early 2017. After briefly reading each other to their lawyers, Maddox and Carter-Smith chose to plead guilty rather than continue a trial scheduled for Nov. 4.

They clearly answered “yes, sir” and “no, sir” to a number of questions, including whether they understood the rights they were giving up and could not change their guilty confessions as soon as they were seized. “I accept oral arguments and find the defendants guilty,” Hinkle said. “Your honor, I want to plead guilty,” Maddox said after a brief conversation with his lawyer Stephen Dobson. The hour-long hearing before U.S. District Judge Robert Hinkle struck a great moment of tension when it looked like plea`s deal could break through. Both Maddox and Carter-Smith doubted when Hinkle asked if they had committed the acts described in their signed statements, which led him to find that they were “dancing” around his questions and wondering if they really wanted to go to court. A review of the plea agreements signed by Scott Maddox and Paige Carter-Smith shows that Maddox signed his plea agreement with the U.S. Attorney`s Office weeks before Paige Carter-Smith.

The United States Attorney`s Office of Northern District of Florida is one of 94 offices that serve as the country`s top prosecutors under the direction of the Attorney General. To access public court documents online, please visit the U.S. District Court for North Florida website. For more information about the U.S. Attorney`s Office, Northern District of Florida, see www.justice.gov/usao/fln/index.html. Dave Moye, a former U.S. assistant prosecutor, discussed what the plea change meant for the whole. The duo plead guilty to collaborating with a ride-sharing company to influence Maddox`s voice as a commissioner, as well as blackmailing an FBI-founded company.

The legal journey for Scott Maddox and Paige Carter-Smith has come nearing the end. Before a federal judge, they both pleaded guilty and accepted a plea. TALLAHASSEE — After reaching a plea agreement with federal prosecutors, Scott Maddox, Tallahassee`s suspended city commissioner, reluctantly pleaded three fraud charges Tuesday in a pay-to-play corruption investigation, when the U.S. attorney announced increased efforts to fight public corruption. He said he was not surprised by the guilty confession, due to the specific nature of the indictment, and called it “hard to beat.” Paige Carter-Smith, however, did not sign an agreement until July 19, 2019. The city`s commissioner, Scott Maddox, suspended, and paige Carter-Smith, his longtime business partner, now face a maximum of 25 years in prison after pleading guilty to fraud charges. The prosecution agreement concerned only three counts. Two for extortion and one for tax evasion. Lawyers for Maddox and Carter-Smith filed a notice Wednesday stating a change to the hearing. Both are charged with 44 counts related to extortion, bank fraud, extortion, bribery, conspiracy to interfere with the IRS and filing false tax returns. The indictment states that Maddox continued, implicitly and explicitly, to seek and accept payments from Company C in exchange for an agreement to participate in official acts in favor of that company. .

. .

Uncategorized