The term “counterpart” is used in the sense of “something against a quid pro quo. An agreement without consideration is a simple promise, and exnudo pacto non aritio actio cannot be made mandatory for the parties. Sir Frederick Pollock defined the reflection: “This is the price for which the promise of the other is bought, and the promise of value thus made is enforceable.” Sometimes a contract is cancelled by the court because it is not considered. This is generally the case: the reason contracts require an exchange of value is to distinguish a legal agreement from a generous gift or a promise made by one party to another, none of which is legally enforceable. For example, if your friend mows your lawn without asking for anything in return, it doesn`t count as a contract because you didn`t promise a quid pro quo. If your friend promises to mow your lawn but doesn`t, you can`t sue for damages. www.preservearticles.com/2012012621491/exceptions-to-consideration-no-consideration-and-no-contract.html Some promises that might otherwise be used as a consideration are invalidated by the Promisor for a number of reasons, including childhood, fraud, coercion or error. But a cancelled contract is not automatically invalidated, and if the coder has not avoided the contract, but then renews its promise, it is binding. For example, Mr. Melvin sells his bike to 13-year-old Seth. Seth promises to pay Mr.
Melvin a hundred dollars. Seth can refuse the contract, but he doesn`t. When he was eighteen, he renewed his promise to pay the hundred dollars. This promise is binding. (A promise made up to its 18th century would not, however, be binding, as it would always have been minor.) Under Section 25 of the Indian Contract Act, there are no exceptions similar to the common law, but some exceptions are established. It states that an agreement is cancelled without consideration, unless most commercial contracts meet the obligation to balance with promises exchanged. The promised work is also considered a consideration. Contracts subject to the International Goods Contracts Agreement (as noted in Chapter 8 “Introduction to Contract Law”) do not require a review to be binding. An agreement that is reached without consideration is unded, unless Timko has served on the board of a school.